VASQUEZ MONTANO v. LLC (2020)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion to recuse or disqualify a district court judge. We are not satisfied that this court's intervention by way of an extraordinary writ is warranted, because petitioner has not demonstrated that the district court acted arbitrarily or capriciously in denying petitioner's motion to recuse or disqualify. NRS 34.160; State v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court (Armstrong), 127 Nev. 927, 931-32, 267 P.3d 777, 780 (2011) (recognizing that a writ of mandamus may issue to control an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion and defining an arbitrary and capricious exercise of discretion as “one founded on prejudice or preference rather than on reason, or contrary to the evidence or established rules of law”) (internal citations and quotations omitted); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (recognizing that a petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that the issuance of a writ of mandamus is discretionary). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.