WARD v. VILLAFLOR (2020)

Supreme Court of Nevada.

Erik Douglas WARD, Appellant, v. Svetlana Ritza VILLAFLOR, Respondent.

No. 80257

Decided: January 23, 2020

Erik Douglas Ward Svetlana Ritza Villaflor

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order purportedly entered on September 24, 2019. Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division, Clark County; Charles J. Hoskin, Judge.

Review of the documents before this court reveals a potential jurisdictional defect. The district court docket sheet does not indicate that any order was entered in the district court on September 24, 2019. To the extent appellant appeals from the July 10, 2019, order extending the temporary protective order, such an order is not appealable. And no appealable order appears on the district court docket entries. Accordingly, as it appears this court lacks jurisdiction, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network