SZYMBORSKI v. SPRING MOUNTAIN TREATMENT CENTER (2020)

Supreme Court of Nevada.

Lee E. SZYMBORSKI, Appellant, v. SPRING MOUNTAIN TREATMENT CENTER, Respondent.

No. 80362

Decided: January 16, 2020

Lee E. Szymborski Hall Prangle & Schoonveld, LLC/Las Vegas

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to reset trial as jury trial. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Trevor L. Atkin, Judge.

Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the order designated in the notice of appeal is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an interlocutory appeal from an order denying a motion for jury trial. This court lacks jurisdiction, and

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network