GRAVES v. EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR COUNTY OF CLARK (2019)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

In this original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus, petitioner seeks an order directing the district court to vacate and reverse its order denying petitioner's postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus on the basis that the district court failed to order the Nevada Department of Corrections to provide a certified audit of petitioner's flat, statutory and work credits prior to denying his habeas petition.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents “essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition”). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (“Petitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted.”). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.