BEARD v. REZAEE (2019)

Supreme Court of Nevada.

Chentill BEARD, Appellant, v. Preston P. REZAEE, Esq.; and The Firm, P.C., Respondents.

No. 79810

Decided: November 18, 2019

Chentill Beard Law Office of David Sampson

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal in an arbitration action. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Joanna Kishner, Judge.

Our review of the documents submitted to this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. Appellant's notice of appeal does not specify what order or judgment is being appealed, but identifies February 6, 2018, as the date the judgment or order being appealed was entered. However, a review of the district court's docket entries reveals no order or judgment having been entered on that date. Because appellant has not identified an appealable judgment or order, we lack jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. NRAP 3A(b). We therefore order this appeal dismissed.

It is so ORDERED.¹

FOOTNOTES

1. In light of this disposition, appellant's October 31, 2019, application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network