Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Clifford THORNTON; and Tracey Thornton, as Husband and Wife, Appellants, v. ALJ REGIONAL HOLDINGS, INC., a Foreign Corp.; Floors N More, LLC, d/b/a Carpets N More; Steve Chesin, Individually; and Jess Ravich, Individually, Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Susan Johnson, Judge.
On April 26, 2019, appellants filed a notice of appeal from the “Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, entered in this action on the 28th day of March, 2019 and the Amended Order entered on the 8th day of April, 2019.” However, the summary judgment order was actually entered on March 13, 2019, and notice of entry was served electronically on that same day. On March 28, 2019, the district court entered an order granting respondents their taxable costs. Respondents have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of a timely notice of appeal. No opposition has been filed.
The notice of appeal is timely from the amended judgment, but not from notice of entry of the original “findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment.” NRAP 4(a). An appeal from an amended judgment is proper only if the amended judgment alters the rights and obligations of the parties arising from the original judgment. See Morrell v. Edwards, 98 Nev. 91, 640 P.2d 1322 (1982), The April 8, 2019, amended order makes no substantive changes to the rights or obligations of the parties, and simply includes the taxable cost amount as due to respondents. Thus, an appeal from the amended order is improper, and the appeal from the original summary judgment order is untimely. An untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court. See Healy v. Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft, 103 Nev. 329, 741 P.2d 432 (1987). This court lacks jurisdiction, and the unopposed motion to dismiss is granted. This court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 78704
Decided: September 30, 2019
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)