GEPSON v. OFFENDER MANAGEMENT DIVISION (2019)

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging the computation of time served.¹ First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James Todd Russell, Judge.

Appellant argues that NDOC failed to properly apply work and educational credits. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that appellant has not demonstrated that he is entitled to any additional credits. NRS 209.4465(2). Further, as noted by the district court, monetary damages are not available in a habeas proceeding. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.²

FOOTNOTES

1.   Having considered the pro se brief filed by appellant, we conclude that a response from the State is not necessary. NRAP 46A(c). This appeal therefore has been submitted for decision based on the pro se brief and the record. See NRAP 34(f)(3).

2.   The Honorable Michael Douglas, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.