Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Harold CORREOS, Appellant, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING; Priscilla Baker; Mccarthy & Holthus LLP; and Western Progressive Nevada Inc., Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from an order dismissing appellant's complaint. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Rob Bare, Judge.
This appeal was docketed in this court on September 13, 2018. On June 14, 2019, this court entered an order directing appellant to file and serve, within 14 days, (1) a brief that complies with the requirements in NRAP 28(a) and NRAP 32 or (2) the “Informal Brief Form for Pro Se Parties” provided by the supreme court clerk, or a motion or stipulation to dismiss this appeal. Pursuant to the order, the documents were due on or before June 28, 2019. This court further cautioned that failure to file the opening brief could result in the dismissal of this appeal.1 To date appellant has failed to file the brief or otherwise communicate with this court.
Accordingly, it appears that appellant has abandoned this appeal, and this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Attachment
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
HAROLD CORREOS, Appellant,
vs.
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING; PRISCILLA BAKER; MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS LLP; AND WESTERN PROGRESSIVE NEVADA INC., Respondents.
No. 76932
FILED JUL 29 2019
ORDER
Appellant filed a notice indicating that the parties had agreed to arbitrate this appeal. Respondents dispute the assertion. This appeal shall proceed.
Appellant shall have 14 days from the date of this order to file and serve either (1) a brief that complies with the requirements in NRAP 28(a) and NRAP 32 or (2) the “Informal Brief Form for Pro Se Parties” provided by the supreme court clerk, or a motion or stipulation to dismiss this appeal. Respondents need not file a response to any brief filed by appellant unless directed to do so by this court. NRAP 46A(c). Failure to timely file an opening brief may result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of this appeal. NRAP 31(d)(1).
It is so ORDERED.
/s/ Gibbons, C.J.
cc: Harold Correos
McCarthy & Holthus, LLP/Las Vegas
FOOTNOTES
1. A copy of this order is attached.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 76932
Decided: July 29, 2019
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)