Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
DONALD ALT, Appellant, v. TAHOE-RENO INDUSTRIAL CENTER, LLC, MANAGING MEMBER; NORMAN PROPERTIES, INC.; L. LANCE GILMAN COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES INC., PRINCIPLE, DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE, LEONARD LANCE GILMAN; NORMAN PROPERTIES, INC., CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CYNTHIA GAGLIANO; AND SECRETARY, DON ROGER NORMAN, Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting a motion to dismiss and from an “Order Denying Plaintiff's Amended Default and Request for Default Judgment Hearing.” First Judicial District Court, Storey County; James Todd Russell, Judge.
Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The order granting the motion to dismiss is not a final judgment appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1) because it does not resolve all of the claims appellant asserted against all respondents in the district court. See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (“[A] final judgment is one that disposes of all the issues presented in the case, and leaves nothing for the future consideration of the court, except for post-judgment issues such as attorney's fees and costs.”). It does not appear from the district court docket sheet that the district court has entered a final judgment in this matter. And no other statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from the order of dismissal. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court “may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule”). Neither does any statute or court rule authorize an appeal from an “Order Denying Plaintiffs Amended Default and Request for Default Judgment Hearing.” Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.1
Cadish, J.
Pickering, J.
Gibbons, Sr.J.
FOOTNOTES
1. The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in this matter under a general order of assignment
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 85568
Decided: November 10, 2022
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)