CITY OF LAS VEGAS v. Bruce Branscomb, Real Party in Interest. (2019)

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order reversing a misdemeanor conviction and remanding for a new trial. We are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (“Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted.”); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (observing that decision to issue writ of mandamus “is purely discretionary”). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.