YARRELL v. STATE (2019)

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion to correct an illegal sentence.¹ Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Kenneth C. Cory, Judge.

Appellant argues that he was entitled to additional presentence credits. Appellant's claim fell outside the narrow scope of claims permissible in a motion to modify or correct an illegal sentence. See Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Therefore, without considering the merits of any of the claims raised in the motion, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the motion. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

FOOTNOTES

1.   Having considered the pro se brief filed by appellant, we conclude that a response is not necessary. NRAP 46A(c). This appeal therefore has been submitted for decision based on the pro se brief and the record. See NRAP 34(f)(3).