Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellant, v. WHITE LANTERN, LLC, Respondent.
ORDER OF REVERSAL AND REMAND
This is an appeal from a final judgment in an action to quiet title. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Joseph Hardy, Jr., Judge. Reviewing the challenged summary judgment order de novo, Wood v. Safeway, Inc., 121 Nev. 724, 729, 121 P.3d 1026, 1029 (2005), we reverse and remand.1
The district court erroneously granted summary judgment for respondent, as appellant's agent tendered $270 to the HOA's agent, which undisputedly represented 9 months of assessments. See Bank of America, N.A. v. SFR Invs. Pool 1, LLC, 134 Nev., Adv. Op. 72, 427 P.3d 113, 117 (2018) (stating that, as explained in prior decisions, “[a] plain reading of [NRS 116.3116(2) (2012)] indicates that the superpriority portion of an HOA lien includes only charges for maintenance and nuisance abatement, and nine months of unpaid [common expense] assessments”). The tender of the defaulted superpriority portion of the HOA's lien cured the default as to that portion of the lien such that the ensuing foreclosure sale did not extinguish the first deed of trust. Id. at 118-21.
Although respondent contends that the tender was ineffective because it imposed conditions and that respondent's predecessor is protected as a bona fide purchaser, we recently rejected similar arguments and respondent has not identified any condition that appellant's agent was not legally entitled to impose. Id. Accordingly, respondent took title to the property subject to the deed of trust. We therefore
ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order.2
FOOTNOTES
1. Pursuant to NRAP 34(f)(1), we have determined that oral argument is not warranted in this appeal.
2. In light of this disposition, the post-judgment award of attorney fees is reversed as well.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 73948
Decided: February 20, 2019
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)