Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
LIZA SIMS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF EDNA GLEASON, Appellants, v. FARMERS GROUP, INC., D/B/A FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, D/B/A FARMERS EXCHANGES, A DELAWARE CORPORATION; GORDON REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP, A LAW PARTNERSHIP; STEVEN INOUYE, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND ROBERT E. SCHUMACHER, AN INDIVIDUAL, Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from an order awarding attorney fees after the partial grant of a special motion to dismiss. Ninth Judicial District Court, Douglas County; Nathan Tod Young, Judge.
This court's preliminary review indicated that the notice of appeal appears to be premature under NRAP 4(a) because the district court has not entered a final written judgment adjudicating all the rights and liabilities of all the parties, and the district court did not certify its order as final pursuant to NRCP 54(b). See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000); KDI Sylvan Pools v. Workman, 107 Nev. 340, 810 P.2d 1217 (1991); Rae v. All American Life & Cas. Co., 95 Nev. 920, 605 P.2d 196 (1979). This court has jurisdiction over a final judgment. NRAP 3A(b)(1), NRAP 4(a)(6). A final judgment is one that finally resolves all claims and issues against all parties to an action and leaves nothing to the district court's consideration except postjudgment issues. Lee, 116 Nev. at 426, 996 P.2d at 417. There can be only one final judgment in a case. Alper v. Posin, 77 Nev. 328, 363 P.2d 502 (1961), overruled on other grounds by Lee, 116 Nev. at 426, 996 P.2d at 417. And without a final judgment, orders regarding attorney fees are likewise not ripe for appeal. Accordingly, this court entered an order directing appellant to demonstrate why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Appellant has responded and concedes that no order has finally resolved all claims by and between all parties. Specifically, appellant does not dispute that the claims for bad faith and breach of the insurance contract remain pending, and does not explain the status of the claims against Steven Inyoue and Robert E. Schumacher.
This court lacks jurisdiction, and therefore,
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Hardesty, J.
Stiglich, J.
Herndon, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 85183
Decided: November 03, 2022
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)