FROST v. The State of Nevada, Real Party in Interest. (2022)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Having considered the petition, the answer, and the supporting documents, we are not persuaded that petitioner has demonstrated that our discretionary, extraordinary intervention is warranted. Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (providing that this court has sole discretion in determining if a writ petition will be considered); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (explaining that petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted); see also NRAP 21(a)(4) (explaining that the appendix to the writ petition should include anything “that may be essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition”). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.