Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, in Its Capacity as Conservator for the Federal National Mortgage Association, Petitioner, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of the State of Nevada, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF CLARK; and The Honorable Mark R. Denton, District Judge, Respondents, Westland Liberty Village, LLC; Westland Village Square, LLC; and Federal National Mortgage Association, Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION
The district court issued a preliminary injunction that prevented Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and other “Enjoined Parties” from foreclosing on, interfering with, or taking other specified actions against Westland Liberty Village, LLC, and Westland Village Square, LLC. Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), in its capacity as conservator for Fannie Mae, sought to intervene.
Prior to the district court permitting FHFA's intervention in the underlying matter, FHFA filed the instant writ petition requesting that this court dissolve the preliminary injunction. FHFA argues that the district court exceeded its jurisdiction under federal law, specifically 12 U.S.C. § 4617(f), and unlawfully restrained FHFA's ability to carry out its duties as conservator of Fannie Mae. FHFA additionally argues that the district court exceeded its jurisdiction under Nevada law by purporting to bind parties that were not before the court and by issuing an impermissibly vague order.
This court recently reversed the underlying preliminary injunction in Federal National Mortgage Association v. Westland Liberty Village, LLC, 138 Nev., Adv. Op. 57, ––– P.3d –––– (2022). Given that the preliminary injunction was reversed, we need not reach the issues raised in this writ petition. See Degraw v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 134 Nev. 330, 332, 419 P.3d 136, 139 (2018) (explaining that this court's duty is to resolve justiciable controversies and that we generally may not give opinions on writ petitions that are moot).
Therefore, we decline to exercise our discretion to consider the extraordinary relief requested and
ORDER the petition DENIED.2
FOOTNOTES
2. The Honorable Abbi Silver having retired, this matter was decided by a six-justice court.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 82666
Decided: October 17, 2022
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)