Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Jamie RISHER, individually, and as legal guardian of Brianna Danielle Risher and Jacob James Risher, individual heirs of Kenneth Robert Risher, deceased; and Karen Mikesell, as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Kenneth Robert Risher, Petitioners, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of the State of Nevada, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF CLARK; and the Honorable Rob Bare, District Judge, Respondents, Lori Straub, APRN; Michael Hixson, M.D.; and North Vista Hospital, Inc., d/b/a North Vista Hospital, Inc., Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus challenging a district court order granting partial summary judgment in a tort action.
Having considered the parties’ arguments and the record, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. NRS 34.170; Gonzalez v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 129 Nev. 215, 217, 298 P.3d 448, 449-50 (2013) (explaining when a writ of mandamus may be warranted and that the decision to entertain a petition for extraordinary writ relief lies within this court's discretion); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that petitioners bear the burden of showing that mandamus is warranted). In particular, we are not persuaded that an appeal from a final judgment is an inadequate remedy. See Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841.1 Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
FOOTNOTES
1. We note, however, that the petitioners’ reliance on Goldenberg v. Woodard, Docket Nos. 57232, 58151 (Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part and Remanding, June 20, 2014), is misplaced as Goldenberg was decided before January 1, 2016, and, therefore, may not be cited for persuasive value. See NRAP 36(c)(3).
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 73793
Decided: September 21, 2018
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)