Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Marlene REDMOND, Appellant, v. DIGNITY HEALTH, d/b/a St. Rose Dominican Health-San Martin Campus; and Herminia Diokno, Respondents.
Marlene Redmond, Appellant, v. Dignity Health, d/b/a St. Rose Dominican Health-San Martin Campus; and Herminia Diokno, Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS
These are pro se appeals from an order denying appellant's motion for an evidentiary hearing for an attorney lien and from an order denying appellant's motion to discharge an attorney lien and motion to compel. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas Smith, Judge.
Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals jurisdictional defects. Specifically, the notices of appeal are untimely filed under NRAP 4(a) because it appears that they were filed before the entry of a final written judgment, and are therefore of no effect. See NRAP 4(a)(1); Rust v. Clark Cty. School District, 103 Nev. 686, 747 P.2d 1380 (1987) (explaining that the district court's oral pronouncement from the bench, the clerk's minute order, and even an unfiled written order cannot be appealed).
Further, it appears that the order designated in the notice of appeal in Docket No. 76374 is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. v. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order denying a motion for an evidentiary hearing.
We conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we
ORDER these appeals DISMISSED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 76374, No. 76376
Decided: July 30, 2018
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)