MULLIGAN v. LLC (2018)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying petitioners' motion to disqualify a district court judge. Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we conclude that petitioner has failed to meet her burden of demonstrating that extraordinary writ relief is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (“Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted.”); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (providing that whether to consider a writ petition is discretionary); NRAP 21(b)(1). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.¹

FOOTNOTES

1.   In light of this order, we vacate the stay imposed by our March 6, 2018, order.