Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
WYKOFF NEWBERG CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; and International Smelting Company, Appellants, v. The STATE of Nevada, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from a district court order enforcing a settlement agreement in an action for eminent domain. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; David M. Jones, Judge.
Because the order appealed from does not enter a final judgment on the original claims, and an order granting a motion to enforce a settlement agreement is not a final order appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1), this court entered an order to show cause directing appellants to demonstrate this court's jurisdiction. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). Appellants have responded and argue that the settlement agreement, coupled with the 2012 order of occupancy providing that the subject property is being used for a public purpose and stating that acceptance of $1,290,000 by appellants would constitute a waiver of all defenses “except as to compensation,” effectively resolved all the claims. We disagree.
Under NRAP 3A(b)(1), an order is appealable as final when it “disposes of all the issues presented in the case, and leaves nothing for the future consideration of the court, except for post-judgment issues such as attorney's fees and costs.” Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000). When the parties settle an action by agreement, “matters potentially remain for the district court's consideration,” “[u]ntil a stipulation to dismiss [the] action is signed and filed in the trial court, or until [the] entire case is resolved by some other final, dispositive ruling.” Valley Bank of Nevada v. Ginsburg, 110 Nev. 440, 446, 874 P.2d 729, 788 (1994) (noting that the district court's order approving a settlement agreement was interlocutory, since the claims were not dismissed or otherwise finally resolved); cf. NRS 17.115 (explaining that, after a party, accepts an offer of judgment, either a judgment must be entered or the case must be dismissed). We therefore conclude that we lack jurisdiction, and we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 74022
Decided: February 26, 2018
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)