CASTRO LLC v. Geraldine Kirk–Hughes, Esq.; and John Salov, Real Parties in Interest. (2018)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION

This original petition for a writ of prohibition challenges a district court order granting a motion to adjudicate an attorney lien. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991); see NRAP 21(b)(1). In particular, petitioners have not provided this court with the documentation necessary for this court to understand and evaluate the matters set forth in their petition, see NRAP 21(a)(4), and petitioners’ right to challenge the order in an appeal from a final judgment constitutes an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 229, 88 P.3d at 841, 844. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.¹

FOOTNOTES

1.   In light of our denial of the writ petition, we deny as moot petitioners’ motion for a stay.