Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
ARIZONA PIPELINE CO., a Domestic Corporation, Appellant, v. DOES 1 THROUGH 100, Inclusive, Respondent.
Arizona Pipeline Company; and Christopher David Hart, Petitioners, v. The Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, in and for the County of Clark; and the Honorable Linda Marie Bell, District Judge, Respondents, Alma Corona; Bertha Pelayo Morales; Bernardo Salinas; Angelica Padilla; and Leslie Palayo Morales, Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL AND PETITION
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, the appeal and petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition are dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b).
It is so ORDERED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 73094, No. 74167
Decided: February 13, 2018
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)