RAHALL LLC v. LYNCH LLC LLC LLC LLC 26 1997 15 1998 LLC (2018)

Supreme Court of Nevada.

Monier RAHALL, an individual; and Tyche, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, Appellants, v. John LYNCH, as Trustee for the John Lynch and Kellie Fuhr Family Trust, member of Tyche Entertainment, LLC, and managing member of Tyche Entertainment, LLC; Kellie Fuhr, as Trustee for the John Lynch and Kellie Fuhr Family Trust, member of Tyche Entertainment, LLC; Brent Fuhr, an individual and member of Tyche Entertainment, LLC; Ken Shipalesky, an individual; Arlene Shipalesky, an individual; Pat Lynch, an individual: Vicki Lynch, an individual; John R. Lynch. Jr., as Trustee for the Lynch Trust Dated August 26, 1997; William M. Ernest, Trustee for the William M. Ernest Revocable Trust Dated December 15, 1998; David Austin, an individual; John Fuhr, an individual; Glenn Ohno, an individual; Tiffany Ohno, an individual; Stephen Ortiz, an individual; Christina Ortiz, an individual; Leighann Wolkowski, an individual; Tyche Entertainment, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Corporation; Yehia “Joe” Awada, an individual; Michael Lynch; and Julie Lynch, Respondents.

No. 70665

Decided: January 29, 2018

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP/Las Vegas Monier Rahall Kung & Brown Jerimy Kirschner & Associates, P.C.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Richard Scotti, Judge.

On November 14, 2017, this court entered an order directing appellant Monier Rahall, by November 17, 2017, to retain new counsel and cause new counsel to file a notice of appearance in this court, or to notify this court in writing that he intended to proceed in pro se. Our order also directed appellant Tyche, LLC, by November 17, 2017, to retain new counsel and cause new counsel to file a notice of appearance in this court. See State v. Stus Bail Bonds, 115 Nev. 436, 436 n.1, 991 P.2d 469, 470 n.1 (1999); Salman v. Newell, 11.0 Nev. 1333, 1336, 885 P.2d 607, 608 (1994). We cautioned appellants that failure to comply with our order could result in the dismissal of this appeal.

As neither appellant has responded to our order or otherwise communicated with this court, we conclude that appellants have abandoned their appeal, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law