WALKUP v. VENTURA (2026)

Supreme Court of Nevada.

Jason WALKUP, Appellant, v. Ofir VENTURA, Respondent.

No. 91999

Decided: February 06, 2026

Jason Walkup Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP/Las Vegas

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The challenged order solely concerns contempt. Orders solely concerning contempt are not appealable. Vaile v. Vaile, 133 Nev. 213, 217, 396 P.3d 791, 794 (2017); Pengilly v. Rancho Santa Fe Homeowners Ass'n, 116 Nev. 646, 5 P.3d 569 (2000). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network