SEAN GERALD BROGNA II SEAN BROGNA v. MIA KANG (2025)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This appeal was docketed on September 11, 2025, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 14 days.

On September 18, 2025, appellant filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with this court. Because a motion to proceed in forma pauperis must be filed in the district court in the first instance, on September 22, 2025, this court entered an order denying the motion without prejudice and directing appellant either file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court and file a file-stamped copy of the motion in this court, or pay the filing fee in this court within 30 days. Appellant was cautioned that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal.

To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's September 22, 2025, order. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2).

It is so ORDERED.1

Clerk of the Supreme Court Elizabeth A. Brown

By:

1In light of this order, respondent's motion to dismiss this appeal is denied as moot.