THE SWINDLE FAMILY TRUST DATED OCTOBER 20 1999 v. LEE SOO AHN AN INDIVIDUAL BOK HYUN EUM AN INDIVIDUAL AND CHELSEA EOOM AN INDIVIDUAL (2025)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion to expunge lis pendens.

A writ of mandamus is available to compel a legally required act or to control a manifest abuse of discretion. Halverson v. Miller, 124 Nev. 484, 487, 186 P.3d 893, 896 (2008); see NRS 34.160. A clear right to the relief requested must be demonstrated, id., and whether a petition for writ relief will be entertained rests within this court's sound discretion. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 123 Nev. 468, 474-75, 168 P.3d 731, 736-37 (2007). It is petitioner's burden to demonstrate that this court's extraordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).

Having reviewed the petition and supporting documents before us, we conclude that petitioner has not met its burden. Accordingly, we decline to intervene at this stage in the district court proceedings and thus

ORDER the petition DENIED.¹

Parraguirre, J.

Bell, J.

Stiglich, J.

FOOTNOTES

1.   In light of this order, petitioner s emergency motion for stay is denied as moot.