Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
PATROCINIO MENDOZA-PALACIOS Petitioner, v. CLARK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Respondent.
ORDER DENYING MANDAMUS PETITION
This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus asking this court to direct the Clark County Detention Center to provide petitioner with copies of visitor logs specific to his former counsel.
In the underlying case, petitioner entered an Alford plea in 2022 to attempted sexual assault and incest and was sentenced to serve consecutive prison terms totaling 20 years to life in the aggregate. In this petition, petitioner is seeking copies of “visitor logs, video visit logs and all court mandates of visits by [former counsel]” during his time in the jail (2019-2022).
Petitioner has not provided this court with any documentation or exhibits in support of his petition and necessary for this court's consideration of the petition. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing that petitioners must submit an appendix containing all documents “essential to understand[ing] the matters set forth in the petition”). Petitioner bears the burden of showing that extraordinary relief is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). We conclude that petitioner has failed to demonstrate our intervention by extraordinary writ is warranted. Smith v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Therefore, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b).
Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Herndon, C.J.
Parraguirre, J.
Stiglich, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 91073
Decided: August 28, 2025
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)