Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
DESERT HARVEST FUNDING, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Appellant, v. CONNIE R. GOLDEN, Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from two district court orders in a breach of contract action.1 Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Tierra Danielle Jones, Judge; Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Maria A. Gall, Judge.
The first challenged order, entered on February 22, 2024, denies appellant's motion for relief from a December 18, 2023, order under NRCP 60(b). The second order, entered on February 26, 2024, enters judgment for respondent on her claims against appellant. When initial review of the docketing statement and documents before this court revealed a potential jurisdictional defect, this court directed appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed. In particular, the challenged orders did not appear appealable as final judgments under NRAP 3A(b)(1) as asserted in appellant's docketing statement. This court also noted that while a post-judgment order denying relief under NRCP 60(b) is appealable as a special order after final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(8), the February 22, 2024, order challenged here is not a post-judgment order. Therefore, it is not appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(8).
In response, appellant asserts, without any argument or citation to authority, that the February 22 order is appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(8). NRAP 3A(b)(8) allows appeals from special orders after final judgment, including post-judgment orders denying relief under NRCP 60(b). Appellant concedes that no final judgment has been entered in the underlying action. In the absence of a final judgment, there can be no special order after final judgment. Thus, appellant's contention that the February 22 order is appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(8) lacks merit.
Appellant agrees that the February 26 order is not appealable as a final judgment. And appellant does not offer any other basis for appealability for the February 22 and 26 orders. See Moran v. Bonneville Square Assocs., 117 Nev. 525, 527, 25 P.3d 898, 899 (2001) (“[T]he burden rests squarely upon the shoulders of a party seeking to invoke our jurisdiction to establish, to our satisfaction, that this court does in fact have jurisdiction.”). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction, see Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court “may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule”), and we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Pickering, J.
Cadish, J.
Lee, J.
FOOTNOTES
1. Former appellant Rone Chang appealed from a third district court order. However, Chang's appeal was dismissed due to the filing of a bankruptcy petition. The third district court order was not appealed by appellant and thus is no longer the subject of this appeal.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 88346
Decided: April 01, 2025
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)