Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
STOVALL AND ASSOCIATES OF NEVADA, A NEVADA CORPORATION AND LESLIE MARK STOVALL, ESQ., INDIVIDUALLY, Petitioners, v. THE HONORABLE ERIKA L. MENDOZA, DISTRICT JUDGE, DEPARTMENT 27 AND THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, Respondents, TRAVIS BUCHANAN, ESQ., INDIVIDUALLY; MARWAN PORTER, ESQ., INDIVIDUALLY; F. TRAVIS BUCHANAN, ESQ. & ASSOCIATES, PLLC, A NEVADA CORPORATION; AND THE PORTER LAW FIRM, LLC, A NEVADA CORPORATION, Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus or, alternatively, for a writ of prohibition seeking to compel the district court to set aside default and dismiss real party in interest's complaint.
A writ of mandamus is available to compel the performance of an act that the law requires as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station or to control an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion. See NRS 34.160; Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Jud. Dist. Ct., 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008). This court may issue a writ of prohibition to arrest the proceedings of a district court exercising its judicial functions when such proceedings are in excess of the district court's jurisdiction. NRS 34.320; Smith v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991).
Whether a petition for extraordinary writ relief will be entertained rests within this court's sound discretion. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 123 Nev. 468, 474-75, 168 P.3d 731, 736-37 (2007). Petitioner bears the burden to show that extraordinary relief is warranted, and such relief is proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law. See Pan v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004). An appeal is generally an adequate remedy precluding writ relief. Id. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841.
Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our intervention is warranted. Id. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.1
cc: Hon. Erika L. Mendoza, District Judge
Stovall & Associates
Murdock & Associates, Chtd.
Eighth District Court Clerk
FOOTNOTES
1. Given our disposition of this matter, petitioner's motion for a stay is denied.
C.J Herndon
Parraguirre, J. Stiglich, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 90048
Decided: March 07, 2025
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)