Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SAEID KANGARLOU, Appellant, v. KEOLIS TRANSIT SERVICES, LLC; REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA; BROADSPIRE SERVICES INC.; AND ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. LLC, Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting a motion to dismiss. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Tina Talim, Judge.
Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. This court “may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule.” Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). The challenged order is not appealable as a final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(l) because appellant's claims against Keolis Transit Services, LLC and Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada remain pending in the district court. See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (“[A] final judgment is one that disposes of all the issues presented in the case, and leaves nothing for the future consideration of the court, except for post-judgment issues such as attorney's fees and costs.”). And no other statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from the challenged order. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction and
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.1
cc: Hon. Tina Talim, District Judge
Saeid Kangarlou
Wolfe & Wyman LLP
Eighth District Court Clerk
FOOTNOTES
1. If aggrieved, appellant may file a new notice of appeal once the district court enters a written order finally resolving the remaining claims.
Pickering, J.
Cadish, J. Lee, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 90178
Decided: March 07, 2025
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)