CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON v. THE STATE OF NEVADA (2025)

Supreme Court of Nevada.

CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

No. 90016

Decided: March 05, 2025

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a purported district court order “denying uncontested petition for writ of habeas corpus/motion for discharge N.R.S. 34.500(1), (3) and (7);motion for return of illegally seized property N.R.S. 179.085(A) and motion for summary/default judgment N.R.C.P. 55 and 56 entered in this action on the 2nd day of January 2025.”

No order was entered in the district court on January 2, 2025. To the extent, if any, appellant is challenging the district court's February 12, 2025, “Order Denying Plaintiff's Summary Demand for Recoverable Damages for Failure to Issue Writ Per NRS 34.670,” no statute or court rule permits an appeal from this district court order. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that this court has jurisdiction only when statute or court rule provides for appeal). Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

cc: Christopher Anderson

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk

Pickering, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network