Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Rowen A. SEIBEL, an Individual and Citizen of New York, Derivatively on Behalf of Real Party in Interest GR Burgr LLC; GR Burgr LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; Moti Partners, LLC; Moti Partners 16, LLC; LLTQ Enterprises, LLC; LLTQ Enterprises 16, LLC; TPOV Enterprises, LLC; TPOV 16 Enterprises, LLC; Ferg, LLC; Ferg 16, LLC; R Squared Global Solutions, LLC; DNT Acquistion, LLC; and Craig Green, Appellants, v. PHWLV, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company; Desert Palace, Inc.; Paris Las Vegas Operating Company, LLC; Boardwalk Regency Corporation; and Caesars Atlantic City, Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
On October 11, 2024, this court granted appellants’ counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel of record, suspending briefing and directing appellants DNT Acquisition, LLC; Ferg 16, LLC; Ferg, LLC; GR Burgr LLC; LLTQ Enterprises 16, LLC; LLTQ Enterprises, LLC; Moti Partners 16, LLC; Moti Partners, LLC; R Squared Global Solutions, LLC; TPOV 16 Enterprises, LLC; and TPOV Enterprises, LLC (entity appellants), within 30 days, to retain counsel and cause counsel to enter an appearance in this court. See NRAP 46A(b)(2) (“A corporation of other entity may not appear pro se.”). Appellants Craig Green and Rowen A. Seibel were also directed to retain new counsel and cause new counsel to file a notice of appearance with this court or to inform this court, in writing, that Mr. Green and/or Mr. Seibel will not be retaining counsel and will be proceeding pro se. The order cautioned appellants that failure to respond could result in the dismissal of this appeal. Appellants failed to respond to this order.
Therefore, this court issued an order on November 18, 2024, directing the entity appellants to, within 14 days, retain counsel and cause counsel to enter an appearance and directing Mr. Green and Mr. Seibel to retain new counsel and cause new counsel to file a notice of appearance with this court, or to inform this court, in writing, that they will not be retaining counsel and will be proceeding pro se, within the same time period. The order again cautioned appellants that failure to timely comply may result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellants have failed to comply or otherwise communicate with this court.
Accordingly, this court concludes that appellants have abandoned this appeal and
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 88623
Decided: January 10, 2025
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)