WARREN v. ZAMAN (2024)

Supreme Court of Nevada.

Allanna WARREN, Appellant, v. Shad ZAMAN; Lisane Forrello; and Dushane Forrello, Respondents.

No. 89298

Decided: November 08, 2024

Allanna Warren Dushane Forrello Lisane Forrello Shad Zaman

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Review of the notices of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. This court “may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule.” Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). No statute or court rule authorizes an appeal from an order to show cause or an order denying a request to recuse a judge. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction and

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.¹

FOOTNOTES

1. Given this dismissal, appellant's pro se motion for an extension of time to file the docketing statement is denied as moot.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network