Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
DAVID BAKER, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE MARK R. DENTON, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, NVCHI HOLDINGS, LLC, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a prejudgment district court order approving a receivers sale of real property and cannabis licenses. Petitioner has also filed an emergency motion for stay, and real party in interest NVCHI Holdings, LLC, has filed an opposition. Additionally, Kevin Singer, court-appointed receiver over district court parties The Hempire Company, LLC, and Nevada Ag Co., LLC, has filed a notice of appearance as real party in interest, which we construe as a motion to intervene as real party in interest. We grant the motion to intervene, NRAP 21(a)(2), and direct the clerk of this court to add Singer, as court-appointed receiver, as a real party in interest to this writ proceeding. Singer has also filed an opposition to the emergency stay motion and a countermotion to dismiss the petition.
A writ of mandamus may be available to compel a legally required act or to correct an arbitrary and capricious exercise of discretion, NRS 34.160, and a writ of prohibition is available to curb jurisdictional excesses, NRS 34.330. Whether to issue extraordinary writ relief is solely within this court's discretion, however, Smith v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 107 Nev. 674. 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991), and it is petitioner's burden to demonstrate that such relief is warranted, Pan v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). Having reviewed the petition, appendix, and other documents filed in this matter, we decline to intervene.
Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.1
Stiglich, J.
Pickering, J.
Parraguirre, J.
FOOTNOTES
1. In light of this order, we deny as moot petitioners emergency motion for stay and the receivers countermotion to dismiss.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 88956
Decided: July 31, 2024
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)