MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON v. MANDALAY BAY CORP CALVIN JOHNSON ROSEMARIE MCMORRIS ALEXANDER CHRISTOPHER BURK REDENTA BLACIC IATSE LOCAL NO 720 JONATHAN SHOCKLEY GGRM LAW FIRM BRIAN CLARK ENCORE EVENT TECHNOLOGIES DANIEL SCHWARTZ AND ANTHONY GOLDSTEIN (2024)

Supreme Court of Nevada.

MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON, Appellant, v. MANDALAY BAY CORP; CALVIN JOHNSON; ROSEMARIE MCMORRIS-ALEXANDER; CHRISTOPHER D. BURK; REDENTA BLACIC; IATSE LOCAL NO. 720; JONATHAN SHOCKLEY; GGRM LAW FIRM; BRIAN P. CLARK; ENCORE EVENT TECHNOLOGIES; DANIEL L. SCHWARTZ; AND ANTHONY M. GOLDSTEIN, Respondents.

No. 88279

Decided: March 22, 2024

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a purported district court order entered on January 19, 2024. Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The district court docket entries do not indicate that any order was entered in the underlying district court case (A-23-883087-C) on January 19, 2024. Accordingly, as appellant fails to identify an appealable order, this court lacks jurisdiction and

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Stiglich, J.

Pickering, J.

Parraguirre, J.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network