BRANDON ADAMS v. EQUIFAX (2023)

Supreme Court of Nevada.

BRANDON ADAMS, Petitioner, v. EQUIFAX, Respondent.

No. 87565

Decided: December 29, 2023

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a pro se original “petition for writ of mandamus and damages” where petitioner appears to complain that his documents have not been filed appropriately.

Having considered the petition and the accompanying materials, we are not convinced that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.¹

Stiglich, C.J.

Cadish, J.

Herndon, J.

FOOTNOTES

1. To the extent petitioner appears to seek relief in various pending filings dated November 20, 2023. November 21, 2023, November 22, 2023, and December 5, 2023, they are construed as motions and denied as moot.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network