JEREMIAH WILLIAM BALIK v. AMG PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY AND SOUTHERN NEVADA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC (2023)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Petitioner has filed emergency petitions for a writ of mandamus.

Having reviewed the petitions and supporting documents, we conclude that petitioner has not demonstrated that our ordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222. 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (providing that petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (explaining that it is within this court's sole discretion to determine if a writ petition will be considered); NRAP 21(b)(1). In particular, aside from a request for damages and nonlicensed attorney fees, which generally are not available in writ proceedings before this court, NRS 34.160. petitioner does not specify the relief he is seeking from this court or why any such relief should be granted. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.¹

Stiglich, J.

Cadish, J.

Herndon, J.

FOOTNOTES

1.   Petitioner's apparent failure to serve the petition on respondents and the justice court constitutes an additional basis for denial. NRAP 21(a)(1).