MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON v. NEVADA BOARD OF PAROLE COMMISSIONERS (2023)

Supreme Court of Nevada.

MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON, Petitioner, v. NEVADA BOARD OF PAROLE COMMISSIONERS, Respondent.

No. 87636

Decided: December 15, 2023

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel this court to file a document in other dockets. Having considered the petition and the amended petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.¹

Stiglich, C.J.

Cadish, J.

Herndon, J.

FOOTNOTES

1. To the extent petitioner's amended petition seeks emergency relief under NRAP 27(e), we deny the request. We grant petitioner's motion to exceed page limits in the amended petition.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network