Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

SOTO v. STATE (2023)

Supreme Court of Nevada.

Mia SOTO, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Nevada; Clark County; and Las Vegas Justice Court, Respondents.

No. 87534

Decided: December 04, 2023

Mia Soto Attorney General/Carson City

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus challenging justice court jurisdiction. Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Was this helpful?

Thank you for your feedback!

FindLaw Marketing Authority Suite

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network

SOTO v. STATE (2023)

Docket No: No. 87534

Decided: December 04, 2023

Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.

Need to Find an Attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

For Legal Professionals

Get a profile on the #1 online legal directory

Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.

Sign Up

Learn About the Law

Get help with your legal needs

FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.

Go to Learn About The Law

Need to Find an Attorney?

Search our directory by legal issue

Enter information in one or both fields (Required)

Copied to clipboard