Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SUNSET FURNITURE, INC., a Nevada Corporation; Boulevard Furniture, Inc., a Nevada Corporation; Francare, Inc. d/b/a/ Purrfect Auto, a Nevada Corporation; Furniture Boutique, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company; Gizmo Empowered Inc. d/b/a Purrfect Auto #14 and USA Auto #3 and # 4, a Nevada Corporation; S550 Investments, Inc. d/b/a Purrfect Auto Service # 515, a Nevada Corporation; Shafik Hirji, an individual; and Shafik Brown, an individual, Petitioners, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of the State of Nevada, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF CLARK; and the Honorable Eric Johnson, District Judge, Respondents, Trata, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order denying a motion to dismiss in a contracts and declaratory relief action. Having considered the petition and its supporting documentation, the answer, and the reply, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.170 (addressing mandamus standard); NRS 34.330 (addressing prohibition standard); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted). Writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and whether to consider a petition seeking such relief is within this court's sole discretion. Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). We generally decline to exercise that discretion as to petitions challenging orders denying motions to dismiss, and we are not convinced that any of the exceptions for doing so apply in this case. Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second. Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197-98, 179 P.3d 556, 558-59 (2008) (discussing exceptions to the general rule). We therefore
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 86869
Decided: November 17, 2023
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)