Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
AUTUMN HOUSTON; AND STACY HOUSTON, A/K/A STACY LACAILLADE, Appellants, v. ARTIQUES HOME FURNISHINGS AND HOME DECOR LLC, D/B/A INSIDE INTERIORS, Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from a district court order denying an anti-SLAPP special motion to dismiss. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Veronica Barisich, Judge.
Initial review of the docketing statement and documents before this court revealed a potential jurisdictional defect. Specifically, it appeared that the notice of appeal was prematurely filed after the filing of a timely tolling motion for reconsideration, but prior to entry of a written order resolving the motion. See NRAP 4(a)(6); AA Primo Builders, LLC v. Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 585, 245 P.3d 1190, 1195 (2010) (describing when a motion for reconsideration carries tolling effect); Lytle v. Rosemere Estates Prop. Owners Ass'n, 129 Nev. 923, 927, 314 P.3d 946, 949 (2013) (a tolling motion directed at an independently appealable order carries tolling effect). Accordingly, this court directed appellants to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The order cautioned appellants that failure to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction could result in the dismissal of this appeal.
Appellants have filed a response to the order to show cause and agree that the motion for reconsideration remains pending below. It thus appears that this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See NRAP 4(a)(6) (“A premature notice of appeal does not divest the district court of jurisdiction.”). Accordingly, this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 84851
Decided: October 04, 2023
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)