Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
JUSTIN ODELL LANGFORD, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
JUSTIN ODELL LANGFORD, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
ORDER ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING DOCKET NO. 86505, AND DIRECTING TRANSMISSION OF RECORD AND REGARDING BRIEFING IN DOCKET NO. 86942
These pro se appeals challenge a district court order denying a postconviction motion to vacate conviction. In Docket No. 86505, the notice of appeal was prematurely filed after the district court entered minutes on the motion but before the district court entered a written order resolving the motion, and although a written order has since been filed, the minutes cited in the notice of appeal were vacated after the appeal was filed. In Docket No. 86942, the notice of appeal was timely filed after the written order denying appellant's motion to vacate was entered. Accordingly, this court concludes that appellant's appeal from the order denying his motion to vacate conviction may proceed in Docket No. 86942; the clerk of this court is directed to administratively close Docket No. 86505 and to transfer the notice of appeal and other documents filed under Docket No. 86505 to Docket No. 86942.
Having reviewed the documents on file in Docket No. 86942, this court has concluded that its review of the complete record is warranted. See NRAP 10(a)(1). Accordingly, the clerk of the district court shall have 30 days from the date of this order to transmit to the clerk of this court a certified copy of the complete trial court record of this appeal. See NRAP 11(a)(2). The record shall include copies of documentary exhibits submitted in the district court proceedings, but shall not include any physical, non-documentary exhibits or the original documentary exhibits. The record shall also include any presentence investigation reports submitted in a sealed envelope identifying the contents and marked confidential. See NRS 176.156(5).
Appellant's opening brief was filed on July 20, 2023. Any answering brief thus is due by August 21, 2023. However, respondent need not file a response to any brief filed by appellant, unless ordered to do so by this court. NRAP 46A(c). This court generally will not grant relief without providing an opportunity to file a response. Id.
It is so ORDERED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 86505, No. 86942
Decided: August 02, 2023
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)