NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. In the Matter of B.G., M.A., and M.G., Minors. (2017)

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. J.L.G., Defendant–Appellant. IN RE: B.G., M.A., and M.G., Minors.

Decided: May 17, 2017

T. Gary Mitchell, Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender Parental Representation, attorney; T. Gary Mitchell, of counsel and on the brief). Sara M. Gregory, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency (Christopher S. Porrino, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Andrea M. Silkowitz, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel and Sara M. Gregory, on the brief). Olivia Belfatto Crisp, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for minor M.A. (Joseph E. Krakora, Public Defender Law Guardian, attorney; Olivia Belfatto Crisp, on the brief).

The judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the Superior Court, Appellate Division's per curiam opinion, reported at ––– N.J. Super. –––– (App. Div. 2015).

PER CURIAM

CHIEF JUSTICE RABNER and JUSTICES LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ–VINA, SOLOMON, and TIMPONE join in this opinion.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network