BARRICK v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY DIVISION OF PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION (2014)

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Matthew J. BARRICK, Jr., Appellant–Respondent, v. STATE of New Jersey, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, DIVISION OF PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION, Respondents–Appellants.

Decided: July 23, 2014

Christine Cartwright Baker, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellants State of New Jersey, Department of Treasury, Division of Property Management and Construction (John J. Hoffman, Acting Attorney General, attorney; Beth Leigh Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Thomas A. Edenbaum, on the briefs). Karen A. Confoy argued the cause for appellant RMD Properties, LLC (Fox Rothschild, attorneys; Ms. Confoy and Joseph Schramm, III, on the briefs). Vito A. Pinto argued the cause for respondent (Lindabury, McCormick, Estabrook & Cooper and Brierley & Humick, attorneys; Douglas S. Brierley, of counsel; Francis G. Grather of Daly & Associates, on the briefs).

Chief Justice RABNER and Justices PATTERSON and FERNANDEZ–VINA, and Judges RODRÍGUEZ and CUFF (both temporarily assigned) join in Justice LaVECCHIA's opinion. Justice ALBIN did not participate. For reversal—Chief Justice RABNER and Justices LaVECCHIA, PATTERSON, FERNANDEZ–VINA, RODRÍGUEZ (t/a), and CUFF (t/a)—6. Opposed—None. Not Participating—Justice ALBIN.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network