Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Bret SCHUNDLER, Diane Sank, and Bret2005, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Kathleen DONOVAN, in her official capacity as Bergen County Clerk, Steven Lonegan, and Paul DiGaetano, Defendants-Appellants, John Murphy, Douglas Forrester, Todd Caliguire, and Robert Schroeder, Defendants,
Republican County Chairman's Organization and Republican County Committees for the Counties of Bergen, Burlington, Essex, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Monmouth, Ocean, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, and Passaic, Intervenors-Appellants. Bret Schundler, Richard Bradford, and Richard Bradford a/k/a Bret2005, Plaintiffs, v. James Hogan, Gloucester County Clerk, and/or John Does 1-15 (fictitious defendant(s) who caused damage to plaintiffs), Defendant-Respondent.
Forrester for Governor, Inc., and Douglas Forrester, Individually, Plaintiff, v. Kathleen A. Donovan, Clerk of the County of Bergen, and Paul Digaetano, Steven Lonegan, Defendants-Respondents, Peter Harvey, Attorney General of New Jersey, Todd Caliguire, John Murphy, Robert Schroeder, and Bret Schundler, Defendants.
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division in the opinion of Judge Kestin reported at 377 N.J.Super. 339, 872 A.2d 1092 (2005).
We add only the following.
The Appellate Division suggested several possibilities to achieve the results it ordered, including altered type face and ballot reorganization. We note that N.J.S.A. 19:23-26.1 specifically contemplates such a flexible approach insofar as it provides that “in the case of a primary election for the nomination of a candidate for the office of Governor, the names of all candidates for the office of ․ Governor shall be printed on the official primary ballot in the first column or horizontal row designated for the party of those candidates.” (emphasis added). Accord N.J.S.A. 19:49-2.
The question has been raised whether the decision of the Appellate Division applies to all twenty-one counties. We hold that it does.
PER CURIAM.
For affirmance-Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices LONG, ZAZZALI, ALBIN, WALLACE, and RIVERA-SOTO-6. Opposed-None.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: May 06, 2005
Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)