HACKENSACK RADIOLOGY GROUP v. RISHI RAKSHPAL (2011)

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

HACKENSACK RADIOLOGY GROUP, P.A., Plaintiff–Respondent, v. RISHI RAKSHPAL, Defendant–Appellant.

DOCKET NO. A–5590–09T2

Decided: June 16, 2011

Before Judges Espinosa and Skillman.

Rishi Rakshpal, appellant pro se. Michael Harrison, attorney for respondent (Stacy Fronapfel, on the brief).

Defendant appeals from an order entered on June 7, 2010, which denied his motion to transfer this action from the Special Civil Part to the Law Division. An order that denies transfer of an action is not a final judgment because it does not adjudicate the claims asserted in the complaint and any counterclaims. See Janicky v. Point Bay Fuel, Inc., 396 N.J.Super. 545, 549–50 (App.Div.2007). Thus, such an order may be appealed only by leave of this court. See R. 2:5–6(a). Defendant did not seek leave to appeal the order denying his motion to transfer, and we undoubtedly would have denied such a motion if it had been made.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as interlocutory.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law