KEVIN PLANKER v. DAYNA KOTT (2011)

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

KEVIN PLANKER, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. DAYNA KOTT, Defendant–Respondent.

DOCKET NO. A–1379–09T2

Decided: March 30, 2011

Before Judges Cuff and Fisher.

Kevin Planker, appellant pro se. Respondent has not filed a brief.

Plaintiff Kevin Planker appeals from an August 25, 2009 order denying his motion to require defendant Dayna Kott to supply him with photographs and information about his son, and another motion to require production of “Docket Records.” Plaintiff also appeals from the October 9, 2009 order denying his motion for reconsideration. In this appeal, plaintiff argues that these orders are against the child's best interests, and the judge erred by denying him records for which he has paid.

Having thoroughly reviewed the brief and appendix submitted by plaintiff, we are satisfied that the arguments advanced by plaintiff are without sufficient merit to warrant discussion in a written opinion. R. 2:11–3(e)(1)(E). The August 25, 2009 and October 9, 2009 orders are affirmed.

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network