DIANA FIDANZATO v. MICHAEL FIDANZATO (2011)

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

DIANA FIDANZATO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHAEL FIDANZATO, Defendant-Respondent.

DOCKET NO. A-2392-09T3

Decided: March 18, 2011

Before Judges Grall and LeWinn.

Diana Fidanzato, appellant, argued the cause pro se. Georgia M. Fraser argued the cause for respondent (Law Offices of William P. Deni, Sr., attorneys; Ms. Fraser, of counsel and on the brief).

Plaintiff Diana Fidanzato appeals a post-judgment order and the denial of her motion for reconsideration of the order. We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Marino in her written statements of reasons accompanying the orders entered on July 31 and November 20, 2009. Upon review of the record in light of the arguments plaintiff presents, we have concluded that they are without sufficient merit to warrant any discussion beyond that provided in Judge Marino's statements. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E).

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network