RICHARD PETECCA v. BOARD OF REVIEW NEW ENGLAND TRENCHERS INC (2011)

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

RICHARD D. PETECCA, Appellant, v. BOARD OF REVIEW and NEW ENGLAND TRENCHERS, INC., Respondents.

DOCKET NO. A-6389-08T3

Decided: January 05, 2011

Before Judges Skillman and Wefing.

Richard D. Petecca, appellant pro se. Paula T. Dow, Attorney General, attorney for respondent (Lewis A. Scheindlin, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Brady Montalbano Connaughton, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief). Respondent New England Trenchers, Inc., has not filed a brief.

Appellant Richard Petecca appeals from a final decision of the Board of Review, which affirmed a decision of an Appeal Tribunal that appellant was ineligible for emergency unemployment compensation benefits because he did not have sufficient base weeks or wages during the base year. We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in the Appeal Tribunal decision. Appellant's argument does not warrant any additional discussion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E).

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law