WELLS FARGO BANK v. UNITED BANK OF PHILADELPHIA DOMERS BONAMASSA STATE OF NEW JERSEY (2010)

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBERT FARMER, PATRICIA I. FARMER f/k/a PATRICIA I. HENDRICKS and LINDA FARMER, Defendants-Appellants, UNITED BANK OF PHILADELPHIA, DOMERS & BONAMASSA and STATE OF NEW JERSEY, Defendants.

DOCKET NO. A-1219-09T3

Decided: October 08, 2010

Before Judges Grall and Alvarez.

Weisberg Law, P.C., attorneys for appellants (Matthew B. Weisberg, on the brief). Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg, P.C., attorneys for respondent (Vladimir Palma, on the brief).

Defendant Robert Farmer appeals from the denial of his motion to set aside a sheriff's foreclosure sale. Having reviewed the record and considered the arguments presented on appeal, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Colalillo in her oral decision of October 9, 2009. We further note that defendant has not presented any argument that warrants discussion in a written opinion. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(E).

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network