W.C., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBERT RINGWALD (2010)

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

W.C., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ROBERT RINGWALD, Defendant-Appellant.

DOCKET NO. A-0581-09T3

Decided: July 16, 2010

Before Judges Carchman and Parrillo.

Ferro and Ferro, attorneys for appellant (Ralph A. Ferro and Nancy C. Ferro, on the brief). W.C., respondent pro se, has not filed a brief.

The court being advised by the attorney for the appellant that the matter is moot because the order from which the appeal was taken has been vacated, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.

PER CURIAM

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law